Case Summary
In Week 9, Team C lost to Team D by 1.2 points. After the matchup ended, Team C noticed that their quarterback’s rushing yards were not properly included in the scoring system, which would have altered the outcome. The commissioner was uncertain whether to retroactively change the result.
Arguments Presented
- Team C argued that league integrity depends on accurate scoring, and the correction should be applied even if it changes the result after the fact.
- Team D argued that results should stand once a matchup is complete, to avoid chaos and constant revisions.
Evidence Considered
- Official NFL stat updates showing the rushing yards in question.
- League bylaws on scoring errors (which were vague).
- Historical precedent in the same league (no similar dispute had occurred before).
Analysis
FantasyCourt emphasizes that accuracy is essential to fantasy sports. While late corrections may be inconvenient, they are necessary to ensure fairness. The commissioner’s role is to enforce correct scoring, not freeze results based on technical glitches.
Ruling
The correction is approved, and Team C is declared the winner of Week 9. FantasyCourt also strongly recommends that the league adopt a written policy on stat corrections for future clarity.
Decision Date: August 8, 2025